4.6 Article

Mechanistic Studies in Ultrasound-Assisted Adsorption for Removal of Aromatic Pollutants

Journal

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
Volume 48, Issue 15, Pages 7368-7377

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ie900049e

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper we try to discern the physical mechanism of enhancement of adsorption of organic pollutants with application of ultrasound. An attempt is made to discriminate between the contribution made by various physical effects of ultrasound and cavitation, viz., microstreaming, microturbulence, and acoustic (or shock) waves, which could generate convection in the medium and enhance the process of adsorption. A dual approach of coupling experimental results to the simulations of a bubble dynamics model has been adopted. Adsorption of three aromatic pollutants (viz., nitrobenzene, phenol, and p-nitrophenol) onto activated carbon has been chosen as a model process. Correlation of the experimental and simulation results reveals that the extent of adsorption in the presence of ultrasound shows an Optimum with the intensity of convection generated in the medium by the cavitation bubbles. The microturbulence generated by cavitation bubbles makes a useful contribution to the enhancement of adsorption. This is attributed to the continuous nature of microturbulence with moderate liquid velocities. On the other hand, acoustic waves emitted by the cavitation bubbles render an adverse effect on the process. This is attributed to the discrete nature and high pressure amplitude of the waves, which create excessively high convection in the medium, causing desorption of the pollutant. The chemical nature of the Pollutant is also found to influence the enhancement effect of ultrasound. For hydrophobic pollutants, the ultrasonic enhancement is more pronounced than for hydrophilic pollutants under otherwise similar conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available