4.6 Article

First-Principles Predictions of Vapor-Liquid Equilibria for Pure and Mixture Fluids from the Combined Use of Cubic Equations of State and Solvation Calculations

Journal

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
Volume 48, Issue 6, Pages 3197-3205

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ie801118a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Council of Taiwan [NSC 96-2221-E-002-106]
  2. National Center for High-Performance Computing of Taiwan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel approach combining first-principles solvation calculations and cubic equations of state is proposed for the prediction of phase equilibria of both pure and mixture fluids. The temperature and composition dependence of the energy parameter, a(T,x), in the EOS is determined from the attractive contribution to the solvation free energy. The volume parameter, b(x), is estimated to be the mole-fraction-weighted average volume of the molecular solvation cavity. This approach does not require the input of any experimental data (e.g., critical properties or acentric factor) for pure components and does not presume any composition dependence of the energy parameter. The Peng-Robinson EOS combined with a solvation model based on COSMO-SAC calculations, denoted as PR+COSMOSAC, is used to illustrate the applicability of this approach. It is found that the relative error from PR+COSMOSAC is 48% in vapor pressure, 21% in liquid density at the normal boiling point, 10% in critical pressure, 4% in critical temperature, and 5% in critical volume for 1295 pure substances and 27.56% in pressure and 5.18% in vapor-phase composition for 116 binary mixtures in vapor-liquid equilibrium. The errors in binary mixtures can be reduced significantly to 6.24% and 2.25% if experimental vapor pressures are used to correct for any errors in the calculated charging free energies of pure species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available