4.5 Article

First Hour Initiation of Breastfeeding and Exclusive Breastfeeding at Six Weeks: Prevalence and Predictors in a Tertiary Care Setting

Journal

INDIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
Volume 81, Issue 8, Pages 743-750

Publisher

ALL INDIA INST MEDICAL SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1007/s12098-013-1200-y

Keywords

Breastfeeding; Exclusive breastfeeding; First hour initiation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To assess the prevalence of first hour breastfeeding initiation and exclusive breastfeeding at 6 wk and identify its barriers in healthy term babies born in a tertiary hospital setting. Methods A prospective observational cohort study was carried out in consecutively selected 400 mothers who delivered (normal, instrumental or cesarean) term healthy babies in a tertiary care hospital setting. All mother-infant dyads were enroled within 48 h of delivery. Results Breastfeeding was initiated within first hour in 255 out of 400, i.e., 64 % of babies. Cesarean delivery and male gender were strongest risk factors for delayed initiation of breastfeeding [OR (95 % CI)= 1.99 (1.14-3.48) and 34.17 (17.10-70.40) respectively]. Among the babies followed up till 6-8 wk, 83 % were exclusively breastfed. Breast milk substitutes were given in 172/400 (43 %) babies on day one, which emerged as an independent predictor of failure to continue exclusive breastfeeding at 6 wk (OR 2.96; 95 % CI 1.09-8.06). Odds of exclusive breastfeeding were two times higher in babies breastfed within first hour (n=255/400, 64%) when compared to babies initiated breastfeeds beyond first hour (n=145/400, 36 %) (OR 2.01; 05 % CI 1.12-3.61). Conclusions Cesarean section and male gender emerged as significant risk factors for delayed initiation (beyond first hour) of breastfeeding in the index study cohort. In addition, use of breast milk substitute emerged as the only predictor for failure to continue exclusive breastfeeding at six weeks in a tertiary care hospital.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available