4.6 Article

A smoothing SQP framework for a class of composite minimization over polyhedron

Journal

MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING
Volume 158, Issue 1-2, Pages 467-500

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10107-015-0939-5

Keywords

Composite L-q minimization; epsilon-KKT point; Nonsmooth nonconvex non-Lipschitzian optimization; Optimality condition; Smoothing approximation; Worst-case iteration complexity

Funding

  1. NSFC [11331012, 11301516, 71331001]
  2. Hong Kong Research Grants Council General Research Fund Early Career Scheme [CUHK 439513]
  3. China National Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists Grant [11125107]
  4. Chinese National Programs for Fundamental Research and Development Grant [2015CB856000]
  5. CAS Program for Cross & Cooperative Team of the Science & Technology Innovation
  6. NSF [CMMI-1462408]
  7. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  8. Directorate For Engineering [1462408] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The composite minimization problem over a general polyhedron has received various applications in machine learning, wireless communications, image restoration, signal reconstruction, etc. This paper aims to provide a theoretical study on this problem. First, we derive the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) optimality conditions for local minimizers of the problem. Second, we propose a smoothing sequential quadratic programming framework for solving this problem. The framework requires a (approximate) solution of a convex quadratic program at each iteration. Finally, we analyze the worst-case iteration complexity of the framework for returning an -KKT point; i.e., a feasible point that satisfies a perturbed version of the derived KKT optimality conditions. To the best of our knowledge, the proposed framework is the first one with a worst-case iteration complexity guarantee for solving composite minimization over a general polyhedron.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available