3.9 Article

The Success Rate of Narrow Body Implants Used for Supporting Immediate Provisional Restorations: A Pilot Feasibility Study

Journal

IMPLANT DENTISTRY
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages 467-473

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31826a583d

Keywords

dental implants; success rate; narrow diameter; small diameter; immediate provisionalization

Funding

  1. Dentatus Implant Division (New York, NY)
  2. University of Michigan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Implants were first designed to be used in the reconstruction of edentulous mandibles. However, with the technological advancement, enormous changes were made to improve the implant design and surface characteristics leading to the wide use of implants in the replacement of missing teeth. During the transition from an edentulous span to a fixed prosthesis, narrow body implants (NBIs) have been proposed to enhance patient comfort and function. Therefore, this study was aimed at investigating the survival and success rates of NBIs used for supporting immediately nonfunctional loaded provisional fixed partial denture (PFPD). Methods: Either 2.2- or 2.4-mm-diameter dental implants were placed transmucosally into the edentulous ridges of 10 partially edentulous patients. PFPD of self-cured bis-acryl composite material were made using either a vacuform template chairside or a relined prefabricated PFPD. Occlusal adjustments were made to ensure that there was no functional loading on the provisional restorations before they were secured onto the transitional implants. Results: At 1 year, the implant success and survival rates were 38.7% and 93.5%, respectively, with a mean percentage of bone loss of 9.46% (0%-40%) and a mean bone loss of 1.19 mm (range: 0-3.5 mm). Conclusions: With a favorable implant survival rate, the use of NBIs to support provisional restorations seemed to be a feasible treatment option. In addition, there is merit for research on the long-term use of NBIs-supported final prostheses. (Implant Dent 2012;21:467-473)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available