4.5 Article

Re-organization of mitochondria at the NK cell immune synapse

Journal

IMMUNOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 122, Issue 1, Pages 18-25

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.imlet.2008.10.008

Keywords

NK cells; Cytotoxicity; Mitochondria

Categories

Funding

  1. CONACYT [SEP-2003-CO2-44228, 169932]
  2. CGPI-IPN [20070268]
  3. EAR
  4. MMBMA
  5. FJSG
  6. COFAA
  7. EDI
  8. SNI fellows
  9. RMF
  10. FER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As part of the innate immune response NK cells destroy infected, transformed, or otherwise stressed cells within hours of activation. In contrast, CD4(+) T lymphocytes require a sustained increase in their metabolism in order to cope with the biogenesis of cell components, in a process of proliferation and differentiation into effector cells. Recently, mitochondria have been implied in T lymphocyte immune synapse function but little is known on the role of mitochondria in the NK cell interaction with tumour cells. Here we analysed NK cells mitochondrial membrane potential (Delta psi(m)) as an indicator of mitochondrial energy status and cellular homeostasis. Upon contact with K562 tumour cells, NK cells undergo Delta psi(m) depolarization, indicating a rapid consumption of their metabolic energy. Furthermore, pharmacological inhibition of ATP synthesis down-regulates NK cell cytotoxic activity. Confocal- and electron-microscopy analyses showed re-organization of NK cells mitochondria towards the site of interaction with K562 tumour cell (NK cell immune synapse), perhaps as a way to compensate for local energy consumption. Interestingly, mitochondrial re-orgainization also takes place following NK stimulation with anti-NKGD2 antibodies but not with anti-KIR2DL1 antibodies, suggesting that activating rather than inhibiting cell signalling, triggered by NK cell receptors, is involved in NK cell mitochondria dynamics. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available