4.3 Article

Divergent outcomes following transcytosis of IgG targeting intracellular and extracellular chlamydial antigens

Journal

IMMUNOLOGY AND CELL BIOLOGY
Volume 92, Issue 5, Pages 417-426

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/icb.2013.110

Keywords

IgG; Chlamydia; FcRn; vaccine

Funding

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [553055]
  2. QUT post-graduate research scholarship
  3. NIH [DK044319, DK051362, DK053056, DK088199]
  4. Harvard Digestive Diseases Center (HDDC) [DK0034854]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Antibodies can have a protective but non-essential role in natural chlamydial infections dependent on antigen specificity and antibody isotype. IgG is the dominant antibody in both male and female reproductive tract mucosal secretions, and is bi-directionally trafficked across epithelia by the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn). Using pH-polarized epididymal epithelia grown on Transwells, IgG specifically targeted at an extracellular chlamydial antigen; the major outer membrane protein (MOMP), enhanced uptake and translocation of infection at pH 6-6.5 but not at neutral pH. This was dependent on FcRn expression. Conversely, FcRn-mediated transport of IgG targeting the intracellular chlamydial inclusion membrane protein A (IncA), induced aberrant inclusion morphology, recruited autophagic proteins independent of lysosomes and significantly reduced infection. Challenge of female mice with MOMP-specific IgG-opsonized Chlamydia muridarum delayed infection clearance but exacerbated oviduct occlusion. In male mice, MOMP-IgG elicited by immunization afforded no protection against testicular chlamydial infection, whereas the transcytosis of IncA-IgG significantly reduced testicular chlamydial burden. Together these data show that the protective and pathological effects of IgG are dependent on FcRn-mediated transport as well as the specificity of IgG for intracellular or extracellular antigens.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available