4.6 Article

Nanoparticle tracking analysis monitors microvesicle and exosome secretion from immune cells

Journal

IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 136, Issue 2, Pages 192-197

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2012.03569.x

Keywords

cell processes; associated and molecules; dendritic cells; T cells

Categories

Funding

  1. Chief Scientist Office (CSO) of the Scottish Government
  2. Scottish Universities Life Science Alliance (SULSA)
  3. Wolfson Foundation
  4. Chief Scientist Office [ETM/56] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanoparticle tracking analysis permits the determination of both the size distribution and relative concentration of microvesicles, including exosomes, in the supernatants of cultured cells and biological fluids. We have studied the release of microvesicles from the human lymphoblastoid T-cell lines Jurkat and CEM. Unstimulated, both cell lines release microvesicles in the size range 7090 nm, which can be depleted from the supernatant by ultracentrifugation at 100 000 g, and by anti-CD45 magnetic beads, and which by immunoblotting also contain the exosome-associated proteins Alix and Tsg101. Incubation with known potentiators of exosome release, the ionophores monensin and A23187, resulted in a significant increase in microvesicle release that was both time and concentration dependent. Mass spectrometric analysis of proteins isolated from ultracentrifuged supernatants of A23187-treated cells revealed the presence of exosome-associated proteins including heat-shock protein 90, tubulin, elongation factor a1, actin and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase. Additionally, treatment of peripheral blood monocyte-derived dendritic cells with bacterial lipopolysaccharide displayed an increase in secreted microvesicles. Consequently, nanoparticle tracking analysis can be effectively applied to monitor microvesicle release from cells of the immune system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available