4.6 Article

Selective culling of high avidity antigen-specific CD4+ T cells after virulent Salmonella infection

Journal

IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 134, Issue 4, Pages 487-497

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2011.03510.x

Keywords

bacteria/bacterial infection; CD4/helper T cells; infection; T-cell receptor; tetramers

Categories

Funding

  1. NIAID [R01AI087830, F31AI091298]
  2. NIDDK [F30DK084674]
  3. University of Minnesota

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Typhoid fever is a persistent infection caused by host-adapted Salmonella strains adept at circumventing immune-mediated host defences. Given the importance of T cells in protection, the culling of activated CD4(+) T cells after primary infection has been proposed as a potential immune evasion strategy used by this pathogen. We demonstrate that the purging of activated antigen-specific CD4(+) T cells after virulent Salmonella infection requires SPI-2 encoded virulence determinants, and is not restricted only to cells with specificity to Salmonella-expressed antigens, but extends to CD4(+) T cells primed to expand by co-infection with recombinant Listeria monocytogenes. Unexpectedly, however, the loss of activated CD4(+) T cells during Salmonella infection demonstrated using a monoclonal population of adoptively transferred CD4(+) T cells was not reproduced among the endogenous repertoire of antigen-specific CD4(+) T cells identified with MHC class II tetramer. Analysis of T-cell receptor variable segment usage revealed the selective loss and reciprocal enrichment of defined CD4(+) T-cell subsets after Salmonella co-infection that is associated with the purging of antigen-specific cells with the highest intensity of tetramer staining. Hence, virulent Salmonella triggers the selective culling of high avidity activated CD4(+) T-cell subsets, which re-shapes the repertoire of antigen-specific T cells that persist later after infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available