4.6 Article

Human Langerhans' cells and dermal-type dendritic cells generated from CD34 stem cells express different toll-like receptors and secrete different cytokines in response to toll-like receptor ligands

Journal

IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 124, Issue 3, Pages 329-338

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2007.02770.x

Keywords

cytokines; dendritic cells; toll-like receptors

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [G0100482] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Medical Research Council [G0100482] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. MRC [G0100482] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Langerhans' cells (LC) and dermal dendritic cells (dDC) are located in the superficial and deeper layers of the skin respectively and represent the main dendritic cell (DC) populations of the skin. LC-like and dDC-like DC can be generated from CD34 stem cells and this system is widely used as a model for investigating these cells and in therapeutic vaccination. Here we report toll-like receptor (TLR) expression in human LC and dDC derived from CD34 stem cells. In vitro-generated DC expressed TLR-1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10. LC, but not dDC, expressed TLR-5, whereas only dDC expressed TLR-3. Maturation of LC was mediated by TLR-2, 4 and 5 ligands, but not by a TLR-3 ligand. dDC maturation was induced by TLR-3 and -4, but not with TLR-5 ligand and only weakly by a TLR-2 ligand. Stimulated LC secreted interleukin (IL)-1 beta, low levels of tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and IL-8, but not IL-6 or IL-10. dDC secreted TNF-alpha, IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10, but little IL-1 beta. IL-12p70 was not produced by ligand-stimulated dDC or LC, but was secreted by monocyte-derived DC (mdDC) stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Thus, in vitro-generated LC and dDC detect different pathogen-associated molecules and show different cytokine-secretion profiles in response to TLR ligands.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available