4.6 Article

Differential contribution of TAP and tapasin to HLA class I antigen expression

Journal

IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages 112-120

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2007.02746.x

Keywords

antigen presentation; cancer; human leucocyte antigen; major histocompatibility complex; tapasin; transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP); tumour

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA98156, CA105500, CA016156, P01 CA109688, R01 CA110249, CA55791, CA67108, R01 CA105500, R01 CA067108, R01 CA098156, P01 CA055791, R01 CA138188] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI063341, R21 AI071183-02] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Expression of class I human leucocyte antigens (HLA) on the surface of malignant cells is critical for their recognition and destruction by cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Surface expression requires assembly and folding of HLA class I molecules in the endoplasmic reticulum with the assistance of proteins such as Transporter associated with Antigen Processing (TAP) and tapasin. Interferon-gamma induces both TAP and tapasin so dissection of which protein contributes more to HLA class I expression has not been possible previously. In this study, we take advantage of a human melanoma cell line in which TAP can be induced, but tapasin cannot. Interferon-gamma increases TAP protein levels dramatically but HLA class I expression at the cell surface does not increase substantially, indicating that a large increase in peptide supply is not sufficient to increase HLA class I expression. On the other hand, transfection of either allelic form of tapasin (R240 or T240) enhances HLA-B*5001 and HLA-B*5701 antigen expression considerably with only a modest increase in TAP. Together, these data indicate that in the presence of minimal TAP activity, tapasin can promote substantial HLA class I expression at the cell surface.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available