4.6 Article

Compromised CD4(+) CD25(high) regulatory T-cell function in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis is correlated with a reduced frequency of FOXP3-positive cells and reduced FOXP3 expression at the single-cell level

Journal

IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 123, Issue 1, Pages 79-89

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2007.02690.x

Keywords

autoimmunity; multiple sclerosis; tolerance; regulatory T cells; FOXP3

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CD4(+) CD25(high) regulatory T cells (Tregs) of patients with relapsing-remitting (RR) multiple sclerosis (MS), in contrast to those of patients with secondary progressive (SP) MS, show a reduced suppressive function. In this study, we analysed forkhead box P3 (FOXP3) at the single-cell level in MS patients and controls (healthy individuals and patients with other neurological diseases) by means of intracellular flow cytometry. Our data revealed a reduced number of peripheral blood CD4(+) CD25(high) FOXP3(+) T cells and lower FOXP3 protein expression per cell in RR-MS patients than in SP-MS patients and control individuals, which was correlated with the suppressive capacity of Tregs in these patients. Interestingly, interferon (IFN)-beta-treated RR-MS patients showed restored numbers of FOXP3(+) Tregs. Furthermore, a higher percentage of CD4(+) CD25(high) FOXP3(+) Tregs in RR-MS patients, as compared with controls and SP-MS patients, expressed CD103 and CD49d, adhesion molecules involved in T-cell recruitment towards inflamed tissues. This was consistent with a significantly increased number of CD27(+) CD25(high) CD4(+) T cells in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), as compared with peripheral blood, in RR-MS patients. Taken together, these data show aberrant FOXP3 expression at the single-cell level correlated with Treg dysfunction in RR-MS patients. Our results also suggest that Tregs accumulate in the CSF of RR-MS patients, in an attempt to down-regulate local inflammation in the central nervous system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available