4.6 Review

Design and development of therapies using chimeric antigen receptor-expressing T cells

Journal

IMMUNOLOGICAL REVIEWS
Volume 257, Issue 1, Pages 107-126

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/imr.12131

Keywords

cancer; immunotherapy; T cells; CAR; gene therapy

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH (NCI)
  2. NIH (NHLBI)
  3. Department of Defense
  4. Leukemia and Lymphoma Research Fund
  5. Center Investigators including Alex's Lemonade Stand
  6. Clayton Foundation for Research
  7. V Foundation
  8. Dana Foundation
  9. James S McDonnell Foundation
  10. Adrienne Helis Medical Research Foundation
  11. Bear Necessities Pediatric Cancer Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Investigators developed chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) for expression on T cells more than 25years ago. When the CAR is derived from an antibody, the resultant cell should combine the desirable targeting features of an antibody (e.g. lack of requirement for major histocompatibility complex recognition, ability to recognize non-protein antigens) with the persistence, trafficking, and effector functions of a T cell. This article describes how the past two decades have seen a crescendo of research which has now begun to translate these potential benefits into effective treatments for patients with cancer. We describe the basic design of CARs, describe how antigenic targets are selected, and the initial clinical experience with CAR-T cells. Our review then describes our own and other investigators' work aimed at improving the function of CARs and reviews the clinical studies in hematological and solid malignancies that are beginning to exploit these approaches. Finally, we show the value of adding additional engineering features to CAR-T cells, irrespective of their target, to render them better suited to function in the tumor environment, and discuss how the safety of these heavily modified cells may be maintained.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available