4.2 Article

Enhanced Maturation and Function of Dendritic Cells Using Hydrogel Coated Plate and Antigen Electroporation

Journal

IMMUNOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages 341-355

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.3109/08820139.2012.757234

Keywords

Dendritic cells; Hydrogel coated plate; Electroporation

Categories

Funding

  1. National R&D Program through the Dong-nam Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences (DIRAMS)
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [50590-2012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dendritic cells (DCs) are potent antigen-presenting cells that can be matured in vitro from immature dendritic cells (iDCs) in the presence of several biological agents such as cytokine cocktail, CD40L, TNF-a and antigen loading, which are necessary and achieved using various protocols, such as lipofection, passive pulse or electroporation. However, these DCs maturation protocols may cause with a significant loss of cells because of cellular attachment and spreading during culturing. Some biomaterials that influence adhesion and development of cells have been used in cell culture techniques, and it was thought that they might be applied on the culture of DCs. In this study, we used polyHEMA, which is a hydrogel coating biomaterial that prevents DCs from adherence, and investigated whether hydrogel coating affects the maturation of iDCs. The efficiency in the generation of mDCs was improved through hydrogel coating procedure and a dendritic cell maturation marker, CD83, was significantly increased in hydrogel-coated culture condition. The antigen-loaded mDCs from electroporation were further expressed the CD83. The mDCs generated in the hydrogel-coated culture condition showed more, longer and thicker dendrites, and produced more amounts of cytokines such as IL-12 and IFN-gamma. Therefore, it was suggested that the hydrogel-coated culture condition could improve function of mDCs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available