4.3 Article

Association of AFF1 rs340630 and AFF3 rs10865035 polymorphisms with systemic lupus erythematosus in a Chinese population

Journal

IMMUNOGENETICS
Volume 64, Issue 12, Pages 935-938

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00251-012-0650-0

Keywords

AFF1; AFF3; Allele; Single-nucleotide polymorphism; Systemic lupus erythematosus

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [30830089, 81172764]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20113420110005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether two single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), AF4/FMR2 family, member 1 (AFF1) rs340630 and AF4/FMR2 family, member 3 (AFF3) rs10865035, show significant evidence for association with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in a Chinese population. A total of 868 Chinese patients with SLE and 975 geographically and ethnically matched healthy control subjects were enrolled in the current study. The genotypes of these two SNPs were determined by Sequenom MassArray technology. Significant evidence for association of AFF3 rs10865035 with SLE was detected (for A versus G, P = 4.81 x 10(-4), odds ratio (OR) 1.26, 95 % confidence interval (95 %CI) 1.11-1.44). However, no association between AFF1 rs340630 and SLE was found in the Chinese population (for A versus G, P = 0.79, OR 0.98, 95 %CI 0.86-1.12). No significant evidence for association of AFF3 rs10865035 polymorphism with any clinical features was detected. By targeting a variant with convincing evidence for association with rheumatoid arthritis, significant association of AFF3 rs10865035 with SLE was detected in the Chinese population, indicating that AFF3 might be a common autoimmunity gene. Further case-control studies based on larger sample sizes in diverse ethnic populations are required to clarify the role of AFF1 rs340630 in SLE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available