4.3 Article

Porcine IgG: structure, genetics, and evolution

Journal

IMMUNOGENETICS
Volume 61, Issue 3, Pages 209-230

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00251-008-0336-9

Keywords

IgG subclasses; Evolution; Genetics; Fc receptors; Comparative immunology

Funding

  1. Cooperative Agreement IOWR with the USDA-ARS [2003-02669]
  2. University of Iowa Carver Trust
  3. National Porkboard [05-015, 06-043]
  4. Hungarian Academy of Sciences [OTKA T049015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Eleven genomic porcine C gamma gene sequences are described that represent six putative subclasses that appear to have originated by gene duplication and exon shuffle. The genes previously described as encoding porcine IgG1 and IgG3 were shown to be the IgG1(a) and IgG1(b) allelic variants of the IGHG1 gene, IgG2a and IgG2b are allelic variants of the IGHG2 gene, while new IgG3 is monomorphic, has an extended hinge, is structurally unique, and appears to encode the most evolutionarily conserved porcine IgG. IgG5(b) differs most from its putative allele, and its C(H)1 domain shares sequence homology with the C(H)1 of IgG3. Four animals were identified that lacked either IgG4 or IgG6. Alternative splice variants were also recovered, some lacking the C(H)1 domain and potentially encoding heavy chain only antibodies. Potentially, swine can transcribe > 20 different C gamma chains. A comparison of mammalian C gamma gene sequences revealed that IgG diversified into subclasses after speciation. Thus, the effector functions for the IgG subclasses of each species should not be extrapolated from same name subclasses in other species. Sequence analysis identified motifs likely to interact with Fc gamma receptors, FcRn, protein A, protein G, and C1q. These revealed IgG3 to be most likely to activate complement and bind Fc gamma Rs. All except IgG5(a) and IgG6(a) should bind to Fc gamma Rs, while all except IgG6(a) and the putative IgG5 subclass proteins should bind well to porcine FcRn, protein A, and protein G.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available