4.3 Article

Enhancement of humoral and cellular immune responses by monophosphoryl lipid A (MPLA) as an adjuvant to the rabies vaccine in BALB/c mice

Journal

IMMUNOBIOLOGY
Volume 218, Issue 12, Pages 1524-1528

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.imbio.2013.05.006

Keywords

MPLA; Rabies virus; Adjuvant

Categories

Funding

  1. National Major Scientific and Technological Special Project [2012ZX10002006-002-003, 2009ZX0913-710]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2011AA02A114]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30901315, 30571650]
  4. Scientific Research Staring Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, Ministry of Education of China [20090071120]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development of effective vaccines against the rabies virus could prevent infection with this fatal virus. However, the current rabies vaccine fails to provide a full range of protection because of its limited ability to elicit a cellular immune response and the requirement for repeat vaccination. Monophosphoryl lipid A (MPLA) is well known as a potent adjuvant to enhance immune responses against virus infection. Here we investigated the efficacy of MPLA as an adjuvant to improve the humoral and cellular immune responses to the rabies vaccine in BALB/c mice. Supplementation of the rabies vaccine with MPLA significantly accelerated the production of specific antibodies by 10 days compared to the original vaccines. Furthermore, MPLA promoted the induction of stronger cellular immune responses by the rabies vaccine, including the production of IL-4, IFN-gamma and the activation of CD4(+)/CD8(+) T cells, than those elicited without MPLA. Collectively, our findings indicated that MPLA enhances humoral and cellular immunity and is a promising adjuvant for the development of more effective rabies vaccines. (C) 2013 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available