4.3 Article

The immune responses of central and effector memory BCG-specific CD4+ T cells in BCG-vaccinated PPD+ donors were modulated by Treg cells

Journal

IMMUNOBIOLOGY
Volume 216, Issue 4, Pages 477-484

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.imbio.2010.09.003

Keywords

T cells; T regulatory cells; BCG; Tuberculosis

Categories

Funding

  1. 115 grant [2008ZX10003011]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [30872300]
  3. National Key Basic Research Program of China (973) [2007CB512404]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most of the studies evaluating the function of tuberculosis (TB)-specific T cells were only based on the ability to produce cytokines, which may not fully reflect the function of T cells. In the present study, we confirmed that Bacille Calmette Guerin (BCG) could significantly induce cytokine production by CD4(+) T cells from BCG-vaccinated PPD+ donors. In addition, CD4(+) T cells were activated, divided and proliferated in response to BCG stimulation. Phenotypic analysis showed that IFNI-gamma(+)CD4(+) T cells displayed CD45RA(-)CCR7(+/-)CD62L(-), indicating that these CD4(+) T cells were central and effector memory cells. The analysis of cytokine profiles demonstrated that most of BCG-specific BrdU(+)CD4(+) T cells produced Th1 cytokines in response to polyclonal stimulation. In addition, we found that regulatory T cells (Treg) suppressed BCG-induced proliferation and IFN-gamma production by memory CD4(+) T cells. The suppressive effects of Treg on BCG-specific responses of CD4(+) T cells could be partially reversed by blocking the production of IL-10. Taken together, our results demonstrated that functional central and effector memory BCG-specific CD4(+) T cells could be detected based on the activation, proliferation and division of these cells, and modulated by Treg in PBMCs from BCG-vaccinated PPD+ donors. (C) 2010 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available