4.3 Article

Different mechanisms regulate CD4+ T cell independent induction of oral and nasal tolerance of CD8+ T cells

Journal

IMMUNOBIOLOGY
Volume 215, Issue 2, Pages 163-171

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.imbio.2009.01.012

Keywords

Mucosal tolerance; Regulatory T cell; CD8(+) T cell; CD4(+) T cell; Suppression

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mucosal administration of antigens is known to induce antigen specific regulatory CD4(+) T cells, but less is known about the effects on CD8(+) T cell function. Using a murine model for mucosal tolerance induction, we show that both oral and nasal OVA (ovalbumin) application reduced OVA specific CD8(+) T effector cell numbers and suppressed in vivo cytotoxicity in response to subsequent immunisation. To investigate whether CD4(+) T cells are essential for oral or nasal CD8(+) T cell tolerance, we used MHC class 11 deficient mice. Normal CD8(+) T cell tolerance was observed in MHC class 11 deficient mice, indicating that CD4(+) T cells are not required for both oral and nasal CD8(+) T cell tolerance induction. To study the direct effects of mucosal antigen application on naive CD8(+) T cells, we adoptively transferred OVA specific transgenic CD8(+) T cells and analysed their fate after mucosal antigen application. Oral OVA application reduced the numbers of OVA specific CD8(+) T cells, whereas nasal OVA application induced proliferation. However, the expanded population of OVA specific CD8(+) T cells from nasally treated mice was unable to proliferate upon re-stimulation, In conclusion, our studies point to suppressive effects of the mucosal immune system directly on CD8(+) T cells and indicate multiple mechanisms of tolerance induction. More insight in these mechanisms of tolerance induction is necessary for the development of mucosal tolerance therapies for autoimmune diseases and allergy. (C) 2009 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available