4.8 Article

Small-Molecule RORγt Antagonists Inhibit T Helper 17 Cell Transcriptional Network by Divergent Mechanisms

Journal

IMMUNITY
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages 477-489

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.04.004

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Multiple Sclerosis Society [RG5030, PP1943]
  2. NIH [R01NS030843, P01NS076410, P01AI039671, K01DK090105]
  3. NIH Pioneer Award [DP1OD003958-01]
  4. HHMI
  5. Klarman Cell Observatory at the Broad Institute
  6. Brigham and Women's Hospital Department of Medicine
  7. Guthy-Jackson Charitable Foundation
  8. National Multiple Sclerosis Society
  9. FZT 111 (DFG-Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden, Cluster of Excellence)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We identified three retinoid-related orphan receptor gamma t (ROR gamma t)-specific inhibitors that suppress T helper 17 (Th17) cell responses, including Th17-cell-mediated autoimmune disease. We systemically characterized ROR gamma t binding in the presence and absence of drugs with corresponding whole-genome transcriptome sequencing. ROR gamma t acts as a direct activator of Th17 cell signature genes and a direct repressor of signature genes from other T cell lineages; its strongest transcriptional effects are on cis-regulatory sites containing the ROR alpha binding motif. ROR gamma t is central in a densely interconnected regulatory network that shapes the balance of T cell differentiation. Here, the three inhibitors modulated the ROR gamma t-dependent transcriptional network to varying extents and through distinct mechanisms. Whereas one inhibitor displaced ROR gamma t from its target loci, the other two inhibitors affected transcription predominantly without removing DNA binding. Our work illustrates the power of a system-scale analysis of transcriptional regulation to characterize potential therapeutic compounds that inhibit pathogenic Th17 cells and suppress autoimmunity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available