4.8 Article

Multidonor Analysis Reveals Structural Elements, Genetic Determinants, and Maturation Pathway for HIV-1 Neutralization by VRC01-Class Antibodies

Journal

IMMUNITY
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages 245-258

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.04.012

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Intramural Research Program of the Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
  2. National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health
  3. International AIDS Vaccine Initiative's Neutralizing Antibody Consortium
  4. Center for HIV/AIDS Vaccine Immunology Grant from the National Institutes from Health [AI 5U19 AI 067854-06]
  5. US Department of Energy, Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science [W-31-109-Eng-38]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Antibodies of the VRC01 class neutralize HIV-1, arise in diverse HIV-1-infected donors, and are potential templates for an effective HIV-1 vaccine. However, the stochastic processes that generate repertoires in each individual of >10(12) antibodies make elicitation of specific antibodies uncertain. Here we determine the ontogeny of the VRC01 class by crystallography and next-generation sequencing. Despite antibody-sequence differences exceeding 50%, antibody-gp120 cocrystal structures reveal VRC01-class recognition to be remarkably similar. B cell transcripts indicate that VRC01-class antibodies require few specific genetic elements, suggesting that naive-B cells with VRC01-class features are generated regularly by recombination. Virtually all of these fail to mature, however, with only a few-likely one-ancestor B cell expanding to form a VRC01-class lineage in each donor. Developmental similarities in multiple donors thus reveal the generation of VRC01-class antibodies to be reproducible in principle, thereby providing a framework for attempts to elicit similar antibodies in the general population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available