4.3 Article

Influence of Sex Differences and Gonadal Hormones on Cocaine Addiction

Journal

ILAR JOURNAL
Volume 53, Issue 1, Pages 14-22

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ilar.53.1.14

Keywords

addiction; behavioral response; cocaine; female; hormone; reward; rodent model; sex difference; women

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) Research Centers in Minority Institutions [RCMI RR-03071]
  2. NIH Diversity-promoting Institutions Drug Abuse Research Program [DIDARP DA-12136]
  3. Professional Staff Congress of the City University of New York (PSC-CUNY)
  4. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [S03RR003071] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [R24DA012136] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cocaine abuse is on the rise among women, and drug addiction studies consistently show greater responses among females than males in various cocaine-related outcomes. Animal and human studies reveal sexually dimorphic patterns in behavioral responses to cocaine in all phases of the cocaine addiction process from initiation to maintenance and relapse. Furthermore, in animal models, females require lower doses of cocaine to develop faster conditioned place preference and cocaine-induced psychomotor behaviors and sensitization. A clear picture is emerging and suggests that the biological basis of sex-specific differences in cocaine addiction lies, in part, in the disparate regulation of the central nervous system by male and female gonadal hormones and, in part, in chromosomal mechanisms that contribute to drug abuse vulnerability. The interactions of the many factors that affect sex differences appear to be complex. For example, in females, estradiol has facilitatory effects overall, whereas progesterone inhibits most cocaine responses. This review presents a discussion of sex differences and the role of gonadal hormones as the biological basis for the sexually dimorphic pattern in behavioral responses to cocaine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available