4.0 Article

Modulus prediction of buckypaper based on multi-fidelity analysis involving latent variables

Journal

IIE TRANSACTIONS
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages 141-152

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/0740817X.2014.917777

Keywords

Gaussian processes; latent variables; carbon nanotubes; Buckypaper; multi-fidelity analysis

Funding

  1. NSF [CMMI-1000088, DMS-1208952]
  2. AFOSR DDDAS [FA9550-13-1-0075]
  3. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology [KUS-CI-016-04]
  4. Division Of Mathematical Sciences
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1208952] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Buckypapers are thin sheets produced from Carbon NanoTubes (CNTs) that effectively transfer the exceptional mechanical properties of CNTs to bulk materials. To accomplish a sensible tradeoff between effectiveness and efficiency in predicting the mechanical properties of CNT buckypapers, a multi-fidelity analysis appears necessary, combining costly but high-fidelity physical experiment outputs with affordable but low-fidelity Finite Element Analysis (FEA)-based simulation responses. Unlike the existing multi-fidelity analysis reported in the literature, not all of the input variables in the FEA simulation code are observable in the physical experiments; the unobservable ones are the latent variables in our multi-fidelity analysis. This article presents a formulation for multi-fidelity analysis problems involving latent variables and further develops a solution procedure based on nonlinear optimization. In a broad sense, this latent variable-involved multi-fidelity analysis falls under the category of non-isometric matching problems. The performance of the proposed method is compared with both a single-fidelity analysis and the existing multi-fidelity analysis without considering latent variables, and the superiority of the new method is demonstrated, especially when we perform extrapolation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available