4.3 Article

Energy and cost impacts of relay and femtocell deployments in long-term-evolution advanced

Journal

IET COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 5, Issue 18, Pages 2617-2628

Publisher

INST ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY-IET
DOI: 10.1049/iet-com.2011.0111

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Mobile VCE
  2. UK EPSRC [EP/G060584/1, EP/G06041X/1, EP/G062420/1, EP/G064105/1]
  3. EPSRC [EP/G064105/1, EP/G060584/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G060584/1, EP/G064105/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In long-term-evolution-advanced (LTE-advanced), heterogeneous deployments of relays, femtocells and conventional macrocells are expected to provide coverage extension and throughput enhancement, while significantly lowering the energy consumption and total-cost-of-ownership (TCO) in cellular networks. This study presents a methodology for estimating the total energy consumption, taking into account the total operational power and embodied energy, and TCO of wireless cellular networks, and in particular provides a means to compare homogeneous and heterogeneous network (HetNets) deployments. The authors introduce realistic energy models and energy metrics based on information available from mobile-network operators (MNOs) and base stations manufacturers. Additionally, up-to-date operational and capital expenditure (OPEX and CAPEX) models are used to calculate TCO of candidate networks. The authors evaluate two scenarios for HetNets, namely a joint macro-relay network and a joint macro-femtocell network, with different relay and femtocell deployments densities. The results obtained show that compared to macro-centric networks, joint macro-relay networks are both energy and cost efficient, whereas joint macro-femtocell networks reduce the networks TCO at the expense of increased energy-consumption. Finally, it is observed that energy and cost gains are highly sensitive to the OPEX model adopted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available