Journal
IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORKING
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages 1866-1879Publisher
IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TNET.2012.2237412
Keywords
Terms-Internet economics; Network neutrality; paid prioritization; Public Option; regulatory policy
Categories
Funding
- Singapore's Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR)
- Ministry of Education of Singapore under AcRF Grant [R-252-000-448-133]
- National Science Foundation [CNS-1017934, CCF-1139915]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Network neutrality and the role of regulation on the Internet have been heavily debated in recent times. Among the various definitions of network neutrality, we focus on the one that prohibits paid prioritization of content. We develop a model of the Internet ecosystem in terms of three primary players: consumers, ISPs, and content providers. We analyze this issue from the point of view of the consumer and target the desired system state that maximizes consumer utility. By analyzing various structures of an ISP market, we obtain different conclusions on the desirability of regulation. We also introduce the notion of a Public Option ISP, an ISP that carries traffic in a network-neutral manner. We find: 1) in a monopolistic scenario, network-neutral regulations might benefit consumers, however the introduction of a Public Option ISP is even better as it aligns the interests of the monopolistic ISP with the consumer utility; and 2) in an oligopolistic scenario, the presence of a Public Option ISP is again preferable to network-neutral regulations, although the presence of competing nonneutral ISPs provides the most desirable situation for the consumers.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available