4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Efficient Algorithms to Explore Conformation Spaces of Flexible Protein Loops

Publisher

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TCBB.2008.96

Keywords

Protein kinematics; protein loop structure; conformation sampling; deformation sampling; inverse kinematics; calcium-binding proteins

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM072970, U54 GM072970] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NLM NIH HHS [R01 LM005652-14, LM-05652, R01 LM005652] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several applications in biology-e. g., incorporation of protein flexibility in ligand docking algorithms, interpretation of fuzzy X-ray crystallographic data, and homology modeling- require computing the internal parameters of a flexible fragment (usually, a loop) of a protein in order to connect its termini to the rest of the protein without causing any steric clash inside the loop and with the rest of the protein. One must often sample many such conformations in order to explore and adequately represent the conformational range of the studied loop. While sampling must be fast, it is made difficult by the fact that two conflicting constraints-kinematic closure and clash avoidance-must be satisfied concurrently. This paper describes two efficient and complementary sampling algorithms to explore the space of closed clash-free conformations of a flexible protein loop. The seed sampling algorithm samples broadly from this space, while the deformation sampling algorithm uses seed conformations as starting points to explore the conformation space around them at a finer grain. Computational results are presented for various loops ranging from 5 to 25 residues. More specific results also show that the combination of the sampling algorithms with a functional site prediction software (FEATURE) makes it possible to compute and recognize calcium-binding loop conformations. The sampling algorithms are implemented in a toolkit, called LoopTK, which is available at https://simtk.org/home/looptk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available