4.7 Article

Optimal Scheduling for Quality of Monitoring in Wireless Rechargeable Sensor Networks

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages 3072-3084

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TWC.2013.050313.121691

Keywords

Optimal scheduling; wireless rechargeable sensor networks; stochastic event capture

Funding

  1. NSFC [61061130563, 61004060, 61222305]
  2. 863 High-Tech Project [2011AA040101-1]
  3. SRFDP [20100101110066, 20120101110139, NCET-11-0445]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2013QNA5013, 2013FZA5007]
  5. [SUTD-ZJU/RES/03/2011]
  6. [NRF2012EWT-EIRP002-045]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Wireless Rechargeable Sensor Network (WRSN) is an emerging technology to address the energy constraint in sensor networks. The protocol design in WRSN is extremely challenging due to the complicated interactions between rechargeable sensor nodes and readers, capable of mobility and functioning as energy distributors and data collectors. In this paper, we for the first time investigate the optimal scheduling problem in WRSN for stochastic event capture, i.e., how to jointly mobilize the readers for energy distribution and schedule sensor nodes for optimal quality of monitoring (QoM). We analyze the QoM for three application scenarios: i) the reader travels at a fixed speed to recharge sensor nodes and sensor nodes consume the collected energy in an aggressive way, ii) the reader stops to recharge sensor nodes for a predefined time during its periodic traveling and sensor nodes deplete energy aggressively, iii) the reader stops to recharge sensor nodes but sensor nodes can adopt optimal duty cycle scheduling for maximal QoM. We provide analytical results for achieving the optimal QoM under arbitrary parameter settings. Extensive simulation results are offered to demonstrate the correctness and effectiveness of our results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available