4.7 Article

Berkovich nanoindentation and deformation mechanisms in a hardmetal binder-like cobalt alloy

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.10.064

Keywords

Hardmetal binder alloy; Hardness; Elastic modulus; Plastic deformation; Mechanical twinning

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [MAT 2012-34602]
  2. Juan de la Cierva Programme [JCI-2012-14454]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A cobalt-base solid solution is the most used binder for hardmetals (WC-Co cemented carbides) in a wide range of industrial applications. In the composite material such cobalt alloy is surrounded by hard carbides grains; thus, a direct evaluation of its intrinsic mechanical properties is not an easy task. In order to overcome this inconvenience, a model cobalt alloy with a composition similar to that exhibited by typical hardmetal binder (containing W and C in solid solution) was processed following a powder metallurgy route. Nanoindentation testing at different length scales has been performed to study the mechanical properties as well as to introduce plastic deformation in individual grains of the dilute face centered cubic (fcc) stabilized model Co-W-C alloy. It is found that it exhibits an isotropic mechanical response, without any evidence of indentation size effects. The main deformation mechanism activated during the indentation tests resulted to be deformation twinning, although combined with limited planar slip but with no evidence of stress-induced phase transformation. Such finding is related to the high W and C amounts dissolved in the model Co alloy studied, and its effect on stabilizing the fcc configuration and increasing the stacking fault energy. The effective use of small-length scale mechanical characterization protocols is finally discussed for understanding deformation response of binder-like alloys and optimizing microstructural design of hardmetals. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available