4.7 Article

Mechanical behavior of open-cell rhombic dodecahedron Ti-6Al-4V lattice structure

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.06.018

Keywords

Lattice structure; Electron beam melting; Compression; Temperature

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [11221202, 11325209]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University, People's Republic of China
  3. National High Technology Research and Development Program [2013AA031103]
  4. Program for International Science and Technology Cooperation Projects of China [2011DFA52590]
  5. Opening Project of State Key Laboratory of Porous Metal Materials [PMM-SKL-1-2012]
  6. Project of State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology [KFJJ15-02M]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The compression behavior of Ti-6Al-4V lattice structure with a cell shape of rhombic dodecahedron, which Was fabricated by electron beam melting, was investigated at different temperatures. A series of quasi-static compression tests were performed at ambient temperature, 200 degrees C, 400 degrees C and 600 degrees C with a strain rate of 10(-3) s(-1). Two groups of design configurations were adopted by changing the cell size and thickness of struts with the sample size maintained unchanged. The results revealed that their properties varied with different cell sizes and temperatures. Larger cell size leaded to lower modulus and strength of the lattice. Higher temperatures resulted in lower strengths, modulus, densification strains and plateau stresses. The energy absorption of lattice at high temperature was discussed, and the experimental data were compared with aluminum foams, titanium foams and stainless steel lattice. It demonstrated that the rhombic dodecahedron Ti-6Al-4V lattice structure could be applied as load-bearing components and energy absorber at high temperature. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available