4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

The capacity gain from intercell scheduling in multi-antenna systems

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages 714-725

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TWC.2008.060615

Keywords

dirty paper coding; MIMO systems; multiuser diversity; opportunistic scheduling; other-cell interference

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The capacity and robustness of cellular MIMO systems is very sensitive to other-cell interference, which will in practice necessitate network level interference reduction strategies. As an alternative to traditional static frequency reuse patterns, this paper investigates intercell scheduling among neighboring base stations. We, show analytically that cooperatively scheduled transmission, which is well within the capability of present systems, can achieve an expanded multiuser diversity gain in terms of ergodic capacity as well as almost the same amount of interference reduction as conventional frequency reuse. This capacity gain over conventional frequency reuse is O (M-t root log N-s) for dirty paper coding and O(min(M-r, M-t)root log N-s) for time division, where N-s is the number of cooperating base stations employing opportunistic scheduling in an M-t x M-r MIMO system. From a theoretical standpoint, an interesting aspect of this analysis comes from an altered view of multiuser diversity in the context of a multi-cell system. Previously, multiuser diversity capacity gain has been known to grow as O(log log K), from selecting the maximum of K exponentially-distributed powers. Because multicell considerations such as the positions of the users, lognormal shadowing, and pathloss affect the multiuser diversity gain, we find instead that the gain is O (root 2 log K), from selecting the maximum of a compound lognormal-exponential distribution. Finding the maximum of such a distribution is an additional contribution of the paper.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available