4.7 Article

Bio-Inspired Relay Node Placement Heuristics for Repairing Damaged Wireless Sensor Networks

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY
Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages 1835-1848

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2011.2131158

Keywords

Relay nodes; Steiner minimum tree; wireless sensor networks

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CNS 0721644, CNS 1018171, CNS 1018404]
  2. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  3. Division Of Computer and Network Systems [1018171, 1018404] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to the harsh surroundings and violent nature of wireless sensor network (WSN) applications, the network sometimes suffers a large-scale damage that involves several nodes and would thus create multiple disjoint partitions. This paper investigates a strategy for recovering from such damage through the placement of relay nodes (RNs) and promotes a novel approach. The proposed approach opts to reestablish connectivity (i.e., 1-vertex connectivity) using the least number of relays while ensuring a certain quality in the formed topology. Unlike contemporary schemes that often form a minimum spanning tree among the isolated segments, the proposed approach establishes a topology that resembles a spider web, for which the segments are situated at the perimeter. Such a topology not only exhibits stronger connectivity than a minimum spanning tree but achieves better sensor coverage and enables balanced distribution of traffic load among the employed relays as well. To further increase the robustness of the formed topology, the SpiderWeb approach is further extended so that the final topology is guaranteed to be 2-vertex connected. Both centralized and distributed implementations of the SpiderWeb approach are discussed. The simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed recovery algorithm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available