4.7 Article

Distributed Optimal Relay Selection in Wireless Cooperative Networks With Finite-State Markov Channels

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY
Volume 59, Issue 5, Pages 2149-2158

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2010.2041803

Keywords

Finite-state Markov channel; relay selection; restless bandit; wireless cooperative networks

Funding

  1. National High-Tech Research and Development Plan of China [2007AA01Z226]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [60971083]
  3. National International Science and Technology Cooperation Project of China [2008DFA12090]
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Relay selection is crucial in improving the performance of wireless cooperative networks. Most previous works for relay selection use the current observed channel conditions to make the relay-selection decision for the subsequent frame. However, this memoryless channel assumption is often not realistic given the time-varying nature of some mobile environments. In this paper, we consider finite-state Markov channels in the relay-selection problem. Moreover, we also incorporate adaptive modulation and coding, as well as residual relay energy in the relay-selection process. The objectives of the proposed scheme are to increase spectral efficiency, mitigate error propagation, and maximize the network lifetime. The formulation of the proposed relay-selection scheme is based on recent advances in stochastic control algorithms. The obtained relay-selection policy has an indexability property that dramatically reduces the computation and implementation complexity. In addition, there is no need for a centralized control point in the network, and relays can freely join and leave from the set of potential relays. Simulation results are presented to show the effectiveness of the proposed scheme.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available