4.7 Article

Jamming Games in the MIMO Wiretap Channel With an Active Eavesdropper

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING
Volume 61, Issue 1, Pages 82-91

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSP.2012.2222386

Keywords

Game theory; jamming; MIMO wiretap channel; Nash equilibria; physical layer security; secrecy rate

Funding

  1. U.S. Army Research Office MURI Grant [W911NF-07-1-0318]
  2. Division of Computing and Communication Foundations
  3. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1117983] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates reliable and covert transmission strategies in a multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) wiretap channel with a transmitter, receiver and an adversarial wiretapper, each equipped with multiple antennas. In a departure from existing work, the wiretapper possesses a novel capability to act either as a passive eavesdropper or as an active jammer, under a half-duplex constraint. The transmitter therefore faces a choice between allocating all of its power for data, or broadcasting artificial interference along with the information signal in an attempt to jam the eavesdropper (assuming its instantaneous channel state is unknown). To examine the resulting trade-offs for the legitimate transmitter and the adversary, we model their interactions as a two-person zero-sum game with the ergodic MIMO secrecy rate as the payoff function. We first examine conditions for the existence of pure-strategy Nash equilibria (NE) and the structure of mixed-strategy NE for the strategic form of the game. We then derive equilibrium strategies for the extensive form of the game where players move sequentially under scenarios of perfect and imperfect information. Finally, numerical simulations are presented to examine the equilibrium outcomes of the various scenarios considered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available