4.7 Article

Variational Bayesian Inference for a Nonlinear Forward Model

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING
Volume 57, Issue 1, Pages 223-236

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSP.2008.2005752

Keywords

Biomedical signal processing; magnetic resonance imaging; nonlinear estimation; signal processing

Funding

  1. GlaxoSmithKline
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council U.K.
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/C539788/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Variational Bayes (VB) has been proposed as a method to facilitate calculations of the posterior distributions for linear models, by providing a fast method for Bayesian inference by estimating the parameters of a factorized approximation to the posterior distribution. Here a VB method for nonlinear forward models with Gaussian additive noise is presented. In the case of noninformative priors the parameter estimates obtained from this VB approach are identical to those found via nonlinear least squares. However, the advantage of the VB method lies in its Bayesian formulation, which permits prior information to be included in a hierarchical structure and measures of uncertainty for all parameter estimates to be obtained via the posterior distribution. Unlike other Bayesian methods VB is only approximate in comparison with the sampling method of MCMC. However, the VB method is found to be comparable and the assumptions made about the form of the posterior distribution reasonable. Practically, the VB approach is substantially faster than MCMC as fewer calculations are required. Some of the advantages of the fully Bayesian nature of the method are demonstrated through the extension of the noise model and the inclusion of Automatic Relevance Determination (ARD) within the VB algorithm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available