4.7 Article

Roughness Encoding for Discrimination of Surfaces in Artificial Active-Touch

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 522-533

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TRO.2011.2116930

Keywords

Artificial touch; force and tactile sensing; microelectromechanical system (MEMS) sensors array; robotic finger; roughness encoding

Categories

Funding

  1. Nanoengineering Biomimetic Tactile Sensors (NANOBIOTACT) [EU-FP6-NMP-033287]
  2. Nano-resolved multi-scale investigations of human tactile sensations and tissue engineered nanobiosensors (NANOBIOTOUCH) [EU-FP7-NMP-228844]
  3. Italian MiUR [PMZT2Z]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A 2x2 array of four microelectromechanical system (MEMS) tactile microsensors is integrated with readout electronics in the distal phalanx of an anthropomorphic robotic finger. A total of 16 sensing elements are available in a 22.3-mm(2) area (i.e., 72 units/cm(2)) of the artificial finger, thus achieving a density comparable with human Merkel mechanoreceptors. The MEMS array is covered by a polymeric packaging with biomimetic fingerprints enhancing the sensitivity in roughness encoding. This paper shows the ability of the sensor array to encode roughness for discrimination of surfaces, without requiring dedicated proprioceptive sensors for end-effector velocity. Three fine surfaces with 400-, 440-, and 480- mu m spatial periods are quantitatively evaluated. Core experiments consisted in active-touch exploration of surfaces by the finger executing a stereotyped human-like movement. A time-frequency analysis on pairs of tactile array outputs shows a clustering of the fundamental frequency, thus yielding 97.6% worst-case discrimination accuracy with a k-nearest-neighbor (k-NN) classifier. Hence, surfaces differing down to 40 mu m are identified in active-touch by both hardware and processing methods based on exteroceptive tactile information. Finally, active-touch results with five textiles (which differ in texture or orientation) are shown as a preliminary qualitative assessment of discrimination in a more realistic tactile-stimulation scenario.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available