4.6 Article

Compositional dependence of optical band gap and refractive index in lead and bismuth borate glasses

Journal

MATERIALS RESEARCH BULLETIN
Volume 68, Issue -, Pages 27-34

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2015.03.033

Keywords

Glasses; Optical properties; Dielectric properties

Funding

  1. University Research Council, Western Illinois University
  2. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-07-ER46453, DE-FG02-07-ER46471]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We prepared a series of lead and bismuth borate glasses by varying PbO/Bi2O3 content and studied refractive index and optical band gap as a function of glass composition. Refractive indices were measured very accurately using a Brewster's angle set up while the optical band gaps were determined by analyzing the optical absorption edge using the Mott-Davis model. Using the Lorentz-Lorentz method and the effective medium theory, we calculated the refractive indices and then compared them with the measured values. Bismuth borate glasses show better agreement between the calculated values of the refractive index and experimental values. We used a differential method based on Mott-Davis model to obtain the type of transition and optical band gap (E-opt) which in turn was compared with the value of E-opt obtained using the extinction coefficient. Our analysis shows that in both lead and bismuth borate glasses, the optical band gap arises due to direct forbidden transition. With increasing PbO/Bi2O3 content, the absorption edge shifts toward longer wavelengths and the optical band gap decreases. This behavior can be explained in terms of changes to the Pb-O/Bi-O chemical bonds with glass composition. We obtained a new empirical relation between the optical band gap and the refractive index which can be used to accurately determine the electronic oxide polarizability in lead and bismuth oxide glasses. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available