4.7 Article

Dynamic Scheduling for Emergency Tasks on Distributed Imaging Satellites with Task Merging

Journal

Publisher

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TPDS.2013.156

Keywords

Distributed imaging satellites; dynamic scheduling; emergency; task merging; backward shift; rehabilitation; heuristic

Funding

  1. Program for Chiangjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University of China [IRT13014]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61104180, 71271216]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Scheduling plays a significant role in improving observation effectiveness of distributed imaging satellites. Although extensive satellite scheduling algorithms have been proposed, none of them focuses on dynamic scheduling for emergency tasks. In this paper, a novel multi-objective dynamic scheduling model for emergency tasks on distributed imaging satellites is established for the first time. To improve user's satisfaction ratio and resource utilization, we propose the task merging strategy: establishing a task merging graph (TMG) model and proposing a task merging algorithm-CP-TM based on clique partition. In addition, a rehabilitation technique is suggested to overcome the disadvantage that task merging will make tasks have less imaging opportunities. To further enhance the schedulability, the task backward shift in the waiting sequence is considered in our study. Furthermore, a novel dynamic scheduling algorithm called TMBSR-DES is presented, which comprehensively considers task merging, backward shift, and rehabilitation. To demonstrate the superiority of our TMBSR-DES, we conduct extensive experiments by simulations to compare TMBSR-DES with three existing algorithm-RBHA, RTSSA, and LSA, as well as three baseline algorithms-BS-DES, TMR-DES, and TMBS-DES. The experimental results indicate that TMBSR-DES outperforms the others and is suitable for emergency task scheduling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available