4.7 Article

Speed Improves Delay-Capacity Trade-Off in MotionCast

Journal

Publisher

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TPDS.2010.126

Keywords

Ad hoc network; mobility; capacity; delay

Funding

  1. National Fundamental research grant [2010CB731803, 2009CB3020402]
  2. NSF China [60702046, 60832005, 60972050, 60632040]
  3. China Ministry of Education [20070248095, 122002]
  4. Qualcomm Research Grant
  5. China International Science and Technology Cooperation Programm [2008DFA11630]
  6. PUJIANG Talents [08PJ14067]
  7. Shanghai Innovation Key Project [08511500400]
  8. National Key Project of China [2009ZX03003-006-03, 2009ZX03002-003, 2009ZX03002-005]
  9. National High tech grant of China [2009AA01Z248, 2009AA011802]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we study a unified mobility model for mobile multicast (MotionCast) with n nodes, and k destinations for each multicast session. This model considers nodes which can either serve in a local region or move around globally, with a restricted speed R. In other words, there are two particular forms: Local-based Speed-Restricted Model (LSRM) and Global-based Speed-Restricted Model (GSRM). We find that there is a special turning point when mobility speed varies from zero to the scale of network. For LSRM, as R increases, the delay-capacity trade-off ratio decreases iff R is greater than the turning point Theta(root 1/k) ; For GSRM, as R increases, the trade-off ratio decreases iff R is smaller than the turning point, where the turning point is located at Theta(root 1/k) when k = o(n(2/3)), and at Theta(k/n) when k = omega(n(2/3)) As k increases from 1 to n - 1, the region that mobility can improve delay-capacity trade-off is enlarged. When R = Theta(1), the optimal delay-capacity trade-off ratio is achieved. This paper presents a general approach to study the performance of wireless networks under more flexible mobility models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available