4.1 Article

Robust Stability Criterion for Discrete-Time Uncertain Markovian Jumping Neural Networks with Defective Statistics of Modes Transitions

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 164-170

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TNN.2010.2093151

Keywords

Markovian jumping neural network; stability; transition probability matrix

Funding

  1. State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology [QAK201008]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [60904001]
  3. Foundation of Science and Technology Innovative Talents of Harbin City [2010RFLXS007]
  4. Outstanding Youth Science Fund of China [60825303]
  5. 973 Project in China [2009CB320600]
  6. Key Laboratory of Integrated Automation for the Process Industry (Northeastern University), Ministry of Education

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This brief is concerned with the robust stability problem for a class of discrete-time uncertain Markovian jumping neural networks with defective statistics of modes transitions. The parameter uncertainties are considered to be norm-bounded, and the stochastic perturbations are described in terms of Brownian motion. Defective statistics means that the transition probabilities of the multimode neural networks are not exactly known, as assumed usually. The scenario is more practical, and such defective transition probabilities comprise three types: known, uncertain, and unknown. By invoking the property of the transition probability matrix and the convexity of uncertain domains, a sufficient stability criterion for the underlying system is derived. Furthermore, a monotonicity is observed concerning the maximum value of a given scalar, which bounds the stochastic perturbation that the system can tolerate as the level of the defectiveness varies. Numerical examples are given to verify the effectiveness of the developed results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available