4.1 Article

Objective Image Quality Assessment Based on Support Vector Regression

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 515-519

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TNN.2010.2040192

Keywords

Image quality assessment; image structure; singular value decomposition (SVD); support vector regression (SVR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective image quality estimation is useful in many visual processing systems, and is difficult to perform in line with the human perception. The challenge lies in formulating effective features and fusing them into a single number to predict the quality score. In this brief, we propose a new approach to address the problem, with the use of singular vectors out of singular value decomposition (SVD) as features for quantifying major structural information in images and then support vector regression (SVR) for automatic prediction of image quality. The feature selection with singular vectors is novel and general for gauging structural changes in images as a good representative of visual quality variations. The use of SVR exploits the advantages of machine learning with the ability to learn complex data patterns for an effective and generalized mapping of features into a desired score, in contrast with the oft-utilized feature pooling process in the existing image quality estimators; this is to overcome the difficulty of model parameter determination for such a system to emulate the related, complex human visual system (HVS) characteristics. Experiments conducted with three independent databases confirm the effectiveness of the proposed system in predicting image quality with better alignment with the HVS's perception than the relevant existing work. The tests with untrained distortions and databases further demonstrate the robustness of the system and the importance of the feature selection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available