4.6 Article

Qualitative and Quantitative Detection of Pesticides With Terahertz Time-Domain Spectroscopy

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES
Volume 58, Issue 7, Pages 2064-2070

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMTT.2010.2050184

Keywords

Partial least squares (PLS); pesticide; quantitative; terahertz time-domain spectroscopy (THz-TDS)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [60774054]
  2. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education in China [20070335123]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper used the newly developed terahertz time-domain spectroscopy (THz-TDS) to detect pesticides, especially imidacloprid, qualitatively and quantitatively in the frequency range of 0.5-1.6 THz. All together, four pesticides and three food powders, as well as polyethylene, were investigated. Different weight ratios of imidacloprid in polyethylene and in sticky rice powder were detected and analyzed with the partial least squares (PLS) regression method. Results show that all four pesticides exhibit unique absorption peaks in the terahertz range, and can thus be easily discriminated between each other and from those food powders that show similar and featureless absorption coefficients. Differences in the refractive indices can also be observed between the pesticides and food powders. Imidacloprid can be identified with its absorption fingerprints in the imidacloprid and polyethylene and imidacloprid and sticky rice powder mixtures. We have achieved the relative error of less than 5% predicting the weight ratio of imidacloprid in these two mixtures with the PLS method, according to the linear relationship found between the absorption coefficient and the weight ratio. In all, the THz-TDS technique is quite promising for the nondestructive pesticide residual detection in food safety control in the near future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available