4.7 Article

Multifeature Landmark-Free Active Appearance Models: Application to Prostate MRI Segmentation

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING
Volume 31, Issue 8, Pages 1638-1650

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2012.2201498

Keywords

Active appearance models; active shape models; levelsets; principal component analysis (PCA); prostate segmentation

Funding

  1. Wallace H. Coulter Foundation
  2. National Cancer Institute [R01CA136535-01, R01CA140772-01, R03CA143991-01]
  3. Cancer Institute of New Jersey

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Active shape models (ASMs) and active appearance models (AAMs) are popular approaches for medical image segmentation that use shape information to drive the segmentation process. Both approaches rely on image derived landmarks (specified either manually or automatically) to define the object's shape, which require accurate triangulation and alignment. An alternative approach to modeling shape is the levelset representation, defined as a set of signed distances to the object's surface. In addition, using multiple image derived attributes (IDAs) such as gradient information has previously shown to offer improved segmentation results when applied to ASMs, yet little work has been done exploring IDAs in the context of AAMs. In this work, we present a novel AAM methodology that utilizes the levelset implementation to overcome the issues relating to specifying landmarks, and locates the object of interest in a new image using a registration based scheme. Additionally, the framework allows for incorporation of multiple IDAs. Our multifeature landmark-free AAM(MFLAAM) utilizes an efficient, intuitive, and accurate algorithm for identifying those IDAs that will offer the most accurate segmentations. In this paper, we evaluate our MFLAAM scheme for the problem of prostate segmentation from T2-w MRI volumes. On a cohort of 108 studies, the levelset MFLAAM yielded a mean Dice accuracy of 88% +/- 5%, and a mean surface error of 1.5 mm +/-.8 mm with a segmentation time of 150/s per volume. In comparison, a state of the art AAM yielded mean Dice and surface error values of 86% +/- 9% and 1.6 mm +/- 1.0 mm, respectively. The differences with respect to our levelset-basedMFLAAM model are statistically significant (p < .05). In addition, our results were in most cases superior to several recent state of the art prostate MRI segmentation methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available