4.7 Article

REDMAPS: Reduced-Dimensionality Matching for Prostate Brachytherapy Seed Reconstruction

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 38-51

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2010.2059709

Keywords

Brachytherapy; combinatorial optimization; integer programming; linear programming; optimal matching; prostate cancer

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute (NIH/NCI) [2R44CA099374, 1R01CA151395]
  2. Department of Defense (DoD) [W81XWH-05-1-0407]
  3. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R44CA099374, R01CA151395] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The success of prostate brachytherapy critically depends on delivering adequate dose to the prostate gland. Intraoperative localization of the implanted seeds provides potential for dose evaluation and optimization during therapy. A reduced-dimensionality matching algorithm for prostate brachytherapy seed reconstruction (REDMAPS) that uses multiple X-ray fluoroscopy images obtained from different poses is proposed. The seed reconstruction problem is formulated as a combinatorial optimization problem, and REDMAPS finds a solution in a clinically acceptable amount of time using dimensionality reduction to create a smaller space of possible solutions. Dimensionality reduction is possible since the optimal solution has approximately zero cost when the poses of the acquired images are known to be within a small error. REDMAPS is also formulated to address the hidden seed problem in which seeds overlap on one or more observed images. REDMAPS uses a pruning algorithm to avoid unnecessary computation of cost metrics and the reduced problem is solved using linear programming. REDMAPS was first evaluated and its parameters tuned using simulations. It was then validated using five phantom and 21 patient datasets. REDMAPS was successful in reconstructing the seeds with an overall seed matching rate above 99% and a reconstruction error below 1 mm in less than 5 s.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available