4.7 Article

A Registration-Based Propagation Framework for Automatic Whole Heart Segmentation of Cardiac MRI

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING
Volume 29, Issue 9, Pages 1612-1625

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2010.2047112

Keywords

Atlas; cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); dynamic resampling and distance weighting interpolation (DRAW); free-form deformations; image registration; inverse transformation; locally affine registration; locally affine registration method (LARM); whole heart segmentation

Funding

  1. EPSRC [GR/T11395/01]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/F059175/1, EP/H02025X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. EPSRC [EP/F059175/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has become a routine modality for the determination of patient cardiac morphology. The extraction of this information can be important for the development of new clinical applications as well as the planning and guidance of cardiac interventional procedures. To avoid inter- and intra-observer variability of manual delineation, it is highly desirable to develop an automatic technique for whole heart segmentation of cardiac magnetic resonance images. However, automating this process is complicated by the limited quality of acquired images and large shape variation of the heart between subjects. In this paper, we propose a fully automatic whole heart segmentation framework based on two new image registration algorithms: the locally affine registration method (LARM) and the free-form deformations with adaptive control point status (ACPS FFDs). LARM provides the correspondence of anatomical substructures such as the four chambers and great vessels of the heart, while the registration using ACPS FFDs refines the local details using a constrained optimization scheme. We validated our proposed segmentation framework on 37 cardiac MR volumes on the end-diastolic phase, displaying a wide diversity of morphology and pathology, and achieved a mean accuracy of 2.14 +/- 0.63 mm (rms surface distance) and a maximal error of 4.31 mm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available