4.7 Article

Fast joint reconstruction of dynamic R2* and field maps in functional MRI

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING
Volume 27, Issue 9, Pages 1177-1188

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2008.917247

Keywords

field map; functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI); joint reconstruction; linear approximation; magnetic field drift correction; physiological noise correction; R-2*

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [EB02683, DA15410]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is conventionally done by reconstructing T-2*-weighted images. However, since the images are unitless they are nonquantifiable in terms of important physiological parameters. An alternative approach is to reconstruct R-2* maps which are quantifiable and have comparable BOLD contrast as T-2*-weighted images. However, conventional R-2* mapping involves long readouts and ignores relaxation during readout. Another problem with fMRI imaging is temporal drift/fluctuations in off-resonance. Conventionally, a field map is collected at the start of the fMRI study to correct for off-resonance, ignoring an), temporal changes. Here, we propose a new fast regularized iterative algorithm that Jointly reconstructs R-2* and field maps for all time frames in fMRI data. To accelerate the algorithm we linearize the MR signal model, enabling the use of fast regularized iterative reconstruction methods. The regularizer was designed to account for the different resolution properties of both R-2* and field maps and provide uniform spatial resolution. For fMRI data with the same temporal frame rate as data collected for T-2*-weighted imaging the resulting R-2* maps performed comparably to T-2*-weighted images in activation detection while also correcting for spatially global and local temporal changes in off-resonance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available