4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Effect of Grain Size and Die-Upset Temperature on Texture in Die-Upset Nd-Fe-B Magnet

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS
Volume 45, Issue 6, Pages 2590-2593

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMAG.2009.2018902

Keywords

Hard magnetic materials; magnetic materials; magnets; permanent magnets

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [핵06A3004] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hot-pressed Nd(13.5)Fe(77)Si(1)B(8) alloy compacts with various grain sizes ranging from approximately 50 nm to 200 nm were prepared using melt-spun material. The compacts were then subjected to die-upsetting. The effect of grain size in the hot-pressed compact on the texture in die-upset magnet was investigated. The effect of die-upset temperature on the texture in die-upset magnet was also investigated. Texture in the die-upset Nd(13.5)Fe(77)Si(1)B(8) alloy samples decreased with increasing the grain size in the hot-pressed compact before the die-upsetting. This dependence of texture on the initial grain size could he explained by the unique texture formation mechanism of a stress-induced preferential grain growth via dissolution and precipitation. Texture of the die-upset sample was also influenced by the die-upsetting temperature. The samples die-upset at 700 degrees C and 900 degrees C had poorer texture compared to the samples die-upset at the temperature range of 750 degrees C-850 degrees C. The poor texture in the sample die-upset at lower temperature of 700 degrees C was attributed to the less dissolution of the unfavorable Nd(2)Fe(14)B grains and low fluidity of the liquid Nd-rich grain boundary phase. The poor texture in the sample die-upset at higher temperature of 900 degrees C was explained by the reduced elastic modulus and the excessive grain growth of the Nd(2)Fe(14)B grains.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available