4.7 Article

Rapid Multiclass Traffic Sign Detection in High-Resolution Images

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2014.2314711

Keywords

Common-Finder AdaBoost (CF.AdaBoost); multiblock normalization local binary pattern (MN-LBP); multiclass object detection; split-flow cascade; traffic sign detection (TSD)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61273277, 61203261]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20130131110038]
  3. Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry [20101174]
  4. Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation Committee [ZR2011FM032]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper describes a traffic sign detection (TSD) framework that is capable of rapidly detecting multiclass traffic signs in high-resolution images while achieving a high detection rate. There are three key contributions. The first is the introduction of two features called multiblock normalization local binary pattern (MN-LBP) and tilted MN-LBP (TMN-LBP), which are able to express multiclass traffic signs effectively. The second is a tree structure called split-flow cascade, which utilizes common features of multiclass traffic signs to construct a coarse-to-fine TSD detector. The third contribution is the Common-Finder AdaBoost (CF.AdaBoost) algorithm, which is designed to find common features of different training sets to develop an efficient Split-Flow Cascade tree (SFC-tree) for multiclass TSD. Through experiments with an evaluation data set of high-resolution images, we show that the proposed framework is able to detect multiclass traffic signs with high detection accuracy in real time and that it outperforms the state-of-the-art approaches at detecting a large number of different types of traffic signs rapidly without using any color information.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available