4.7 Article

In-situ TEM/heavy ion irradiation on ultrafine-and nanocrystalline-grained tungsten: Effect of 3 MeV Si, Cu and W ions

Journal

MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION
Volume 99, Issue -, Pages 68-76

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2014.11.013

Keywords

In-situ; TEM; Characterization; Nanocyrstalline; Irradiation; Defects

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-AC04-94AL85000]
  2. Office Of The Director
  3. Office Of Internatl Science &Engineering [1243490] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plasma facing components for future fusion applications will experience helium- and neutron-induced structural damage. Direct observation of the in-situ dynamic response of such components during particle beam exposure assists in fundamental understanding of the physical phenomena that give rise to their irradiation resistance. We investigated the response of ultrafine and nanocrystalline-grained tungsten to 3 MeV heavy ion irradiations (Si2+, Cu3+ and W4+) for the simulation of neutron-induced damage through transmutation reactions via insitu ion irradiation-transmission electron microscopy experiments. Defect densities as a function of irradiation dose (displacement per atom) and fluence were studied. Four stages of defect densities evolution were observed, as a function of irradiation dose: I) increase in defect density at lower doses, 2) higher defect production rate at the intermediate doses (before saturation), 3) reaching the maximum value, and 4) drop of the defect density in the case of W4+, possibly due to defect coalescence and grain boundary absorption of small defect clusters. The effect of grain size on defect densities was investigated and found that defect densities were independent of grain size in the ultrafine and nanocrystalline region (60-400 nm). These results were compared to other heavy ion irradiation studies of structural materials. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available