4.5 Article

The Squashed Entanglement of a Quantum Channel

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY
Volume 60, Issue 8, Pages 4987-4998

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIT.2014.2330313

Keywords

Squashed entanglement; private states; secret key agreement capacity; quantum capacity; quantum key distribution; pure-loss bosonic channel

Funding

  1. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Quiness Program through the U.S. Army Research Office [W31P4Q-12-1-0019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper defines the squashed entanglement of a quantum channel as the maximum squashed entanglement that can be registered by a sender and receiver at the input and output of a quantum channel, respectively. A new subadditivity inequality for the original squashed entanglement measure of Christandl and Winter leads to the conclusion that the squashed entanglement of a quantum channel is an additive function of a tensor product of any two quantum channels. More importantly, this new subadditivity inequality, along with prior results of Christandl and Winter, establishes the squashed entanglement of a quantum channel as an upper bound on the quantum communication capacity of any channel assisted by unlimited forward and backward classical communication. A similar proof establishes this quantity as an upper bound on the private capacity of a quantum channel assisted by unlimited forward and backward public classical communication. This latter result is relevant as a limitation on rates achievable in quantum key distribution. As an important application, we determine that these capacities can never exceed log((1 + eta)/(1 - eta)) for a pure-loss bosonic channel for which a fraction. of the input photons make it to the output on average. The best known lower bound on these capacities is equal to log(1/(1 - eta)). Thus, in the high-loss regime for which eta << 1, this new upper bound demonstrates that the protocols corresponding to the above lower bound are nearly optimal.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available