4.5 Article

Upper Bounds on the Capacity of Binary Channels With Causal Adversaries

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY
Volume 59, Issue 6, Pages 3753-3763

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIT.2013.2245721

Keywords

Arbitrarily varying channels (AVCs); channel coding; jamming

Funding

  1. ISF Grant [480/08]
  2. RGC GRF [412608, 412809]
  3. RGC AoE Grant of the Institute of Network Coding under the University Grant Committee of Hong Kong
  4. RGC AoE Grant of the Institute of Network Coding under the CUHK MoE-Microsoft Key Laboratory of Humancentric Computing and Interface Technologies
  5. RGC AoE Grant of the Institute of Network Coding under the Bharti Centre for Communication, IIT Bombay, India
  6. RGC AoE Grant of the Institute of Network Coding under the California Institute for Telecommunications and Information Technology (CALIT2), University of California, San Diego

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we consider the communication of information in the presence of a causal adversarial jammer. In the setting under study, a sender wishes to communicate a message to a receiver by transmitting a codeword x = (x(1),..., x(n)) bit-by-bit over a communication channel. The sender and the receiver do not share common randomness. The adversarial jammer can view the transmitted bits x(i) one at a time and can change up to a p-fraction of them. However, the decisions of the jammer must be made in a causal manner. Namely, for each bit x(i), the jammer's decision on whether to corrupt it or not must depend only on x(j) for j <= i. This is in contrast to the classical adversarial jamming situations in which the jammer has no knowledge of x, or knows x completely. In this study, we present upper bounds (that hold under both the average and maximal probability of error criteria) on the capacity which hold for both deterministic and stochastic encoding schemes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available